Archive for Notes & Abstracts

Communities in the blogosphere?

Lilia Efimova and Stephanie Hendrick are looking for communities and virtual settlements in the blogosphere. Efimova maintains an interesting PhD blog about blog research, but why does she hang on to the concept of community, and the spatial metaphor of settlement? I would argue that we should use other concepts than community in order to analyze what is going on in the blogosphere. Actually, my claim is that the dominant metaphors of spatial settlement and community are blocking the study of blogs. Let's get rid of the community metaphor!
Read more… »

Comments (2) · ·

Social network analysis and its discontents

This weeks perspective in the course Network theory is on Social Network Analysis. Though I acknowledge this can be a useful method for mapping networks and excavating groups or clusters, I still have the feeling that something important escapes in this method.
Read more… »

Comments · ·

Metaphor theory framework

My blog has been very silent during this month, but honestly, I wrote like hell…
I finished my paper concept on conceptual, material and discourse metaphors, which now has been submitted for the ICA conference 2006 in Dresden, in the Philosophy of Communication division.
In fact, with this piece I outlined the base of my theoretical framework regarding metaphor theory, so I am very satisfied.

Meanwhile my 'metaphor club' (a lose association of people researching metaphors in technology, science and culture) is preparing two panels for the 4th European Biannual Conference of the Society for Science, Literature, and the Arts, called Close Encounters. We probably will do something called 'beyond Lakoff & Johnson', and in this context I will present the stuff on material and discourse metaphors.
Meanwhile, my half year course teaching period had started, and my course New Media New Citizenship is on the road again…

Comments · ·

Reading Katherine Hayles (Eng.)

My eyes hooked on the following sentence in Katherine Hayles' book My mother was a computer: 'Beds, even more than telegraph offices, are notorious sites of the exchange of information.' (p.83) Beds as medium :-) unorthodox but true, not only in the literature narratives Hayles talks about.
Perhaps I just made things too difficult regarding what we call a medium. I concluded it was impossible to define medium universally applicable but now I doubt. Why not defining a medium as any site (state, thing, place) which enables the exchange (coding/decoding) of information? It can be a tool, a device, a system, electricity, light, a bed, a body… Depending on the context anything can function as a medium, and thereby becoming a medium. Mediation then is an intricate process in which something is functioning as a medium. Another universal definition…

Still, the reduction of a process (of mediation) to a state, thing or place can be seen as ontologizing. The above universal definition of medium is in fact a definition of ontologized media. Though ontologizing is a productive epistemological movement, I still hold that this movement should not be reproduced in the analytical concepts which serve to clarify the processes involved. Mediation then is a better starting point.

So, we have recognized ontologized media (the raw material by which remediation as conceived by Bolter and Grusin operates, which I extended with a notion of demediation), and we have 'becoming media', the translation of anything into a medium, which I dubbed transmediation.
Intermediation – which was the term I thought I 'invented' in my earlier notes and did give a lecture about, is then the whole system of ongoing mediations (i.e. remediations, demediations and transmediations).
Surprisingly Hayles comes up with the same term, in the context of what she analyzes as the interactions of different worldviews of code, of writing, and of speech: 'These complex and entangled interactions are what I call ?intermediation,? a term suggested by Nicholas Gessler.' (p31).1
Damn it, I did not invent the term :-(


  1. The article of Gessler Hayles refers to in a footnote is called 'Evolving artificial cultural things-that-think and work by dynamical hierarchical synthesis' http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/geog/gessler/cv-pubs/03naacsos.pdf (↩ back to text ↩)

Comments (6) · ·

Tools, machines and politics

Quotes from Sandbothe 2005
Read more… »

Comments (1) · ·

Peirce on pragmatism

Quotes from Sandbothe 2005
Read more… »

Comments (1) · ·

Rorty’s mirror metaphor

Check out Rorty, The mirror of nature
Quotes from Sandbothe 2005
Read more… »

Comments (1) · ·

Davidson on triangulation

Quotes from Sandbothe 2005
Read more… »

Comments · ·

Pragmatic media philosophy

Mike Sandbothe, Pragmatic media philosophy: Foundations of a new discipline in the Internet Age (Pragmatische Medienphilosophie: Grundlegung einer neuen Disziplin im Zeitalter des Internet. Weilerswist: Velbr?ck Wissenschaft 2001, translated by Andrew Inkpin) Online Publication: www.sandbothe.net 2005
Read more… »

Comments (1) · ·

What do we call a medium? (Eng.)


Both in ordinairy and in scholarly speech the word medium signifies very different things. We speak of 'the media' as a general container concept but also of different media, focussing on media specific features or even media ontologies. But what for example doe we mean when we speak of 'the medium film': are we talking then about the celluloid, the cinema, the studio, Hollywood, cameras, framing and montage, screen projection, moving images? Read more… »

Comments (2) · ·

« Previous entries

Bad Behavior has blocked 64 access attempts in the last 7 days.